#BACKBLAZE VS S3 ARCHIVE#
It can be supplemented with the Microsoft LRS Archive tier (some tinkering required) for immutable backup containers. It seems as of today, Wasabi offers the most compatible and cost-effective backup target. When storage needs approach 2 Tb Crashplan Pro again becomes an option, however, performance is a concern. For comparison, AWS charges around 0.023 per GB for the first 50 TB per month for the S3 Standard storage class. Our Backblaze S3 compatible layer is not just compatibleaccording to him, it’s Very compatible.Synology promised B2 support in Hyper Backup in 2018 Get Hot S3 Compatible Storage today Why IDrive ® e2 is better. Backblaze B2 is not supported by Synology’s Hyper Backup. Compare price, features, and reviews of the software side-by-side to make the best.(Make sure that the bucket name is a valid Backblaze bucket, but doesnt meet the S3 bucket naming rules, examples above). Amazon Glacier and Azure Archive require blob level management and due to thawing/rehydration requirements will likely never be supported in Hyper Backup or similar automatic backup software that said it is a perfect target for one-way sync of encrypted backup containers with immutable objects – such as Duplicacy. Dylan-Osborne commented on Open Cryptomator and click Add existing vault.This is the costs of cloud storage as of the date of this posting Providerįor the purposes of Backup keep in mind the following intricacies:
0 kommentar(er)
